Lanka Focus https://lankafocus.org/ Bringing the Global Sri Lankan Communities together Thu, 14 Nov 2024 06:20:55 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7 Explainer: Sri Lanka’s key political risks after parliamentary elections https://lankafocus.org/2024/11/14/explainer-sri-lankas-key-political-risks-after-parliamentary-elections/ https://lankafocus.org/2024/11/14/explainer-sri-lankas-key-political-risks-after-parliamentary-elections/#respond Thu, 14 Nov 2024 06:19:27 +0000 https://lankafocus.org/?p=2295 Explainer: Sri Lanka’s key political risks after parliamentary elections By Shihar Aneez Wednesday November 13, 2024 12:55 pm   ECONOMYNEXT – Sri Lanka’s President Anura Dissanayake faces a range of key political risks and challenges, particularly given his position as the leader of the Marxist Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP), a historically leftist alliance. The NPP is tipped to win the November 14 parliamentary polls, but it is uncertain what number of seats it will gain in the 225-member legislature. Dissanayake’s JVP has been involved in two insurrections…

The post Explainer: Sri Lanka’s key political risks after parliamentary elections appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>

Explainer: Sri Lanka’s key political risks after parliamentary elections

 

ECONOMYNEXT – Sri Lanka’s President Anura Dissanayake faces a range of key political risks and challenges, particularly given his position as the leader of the Marxist Janatha Vimukthi Peramuna (JVP)-led National People’s Power (NPP), a historically leftist alliance.

The NPP is tipped to win the November 14 parliamentary polls, but it is uncertain what number of seats it will gain in the 225-member legislature.

Dissanayake’s JVP has been involved in two insurrections in the past, while his broader NPP coalition is accused by rivals of having no experience in handling critical issues as a ruling party in the government.

Here is a detailed overview of the major political risks and policy dilemmas for Dissanayake’s government after forming an extended NPP government beyond the current three-member cabinet:

1. Economic Instability and IMF Engagement:

Sri Lanka’s economy remains fragile, and Dissanayake’s administration has to continue managing the terms of the International Monetary Fund bailout package initiated by the previous center-right government. While the NPP pledged to renegotiate certain terms, balancing economic reforms with domestic economic protectionism and socialist policies may prove contentious​. So far, Dissanayake’s 50-day “transition” government has maintained the status quo on the IMF deal, contrary to NPP’s hard stance to renegotiate and change the debt sustainability analysis (DSA). The DSA is a strategy Sri Lanka agreed with the global lender to achieve sustainable debt repayment and come out of its 2022 sovereign debt default.

Factors to watch:

  • Changes in the new government’s tax policies
  • New government’s revenue proposals
  • Delay in the third IMF review and 4th tranche disbursement
  • Delay in receiving some World Bank, ADB funds due to delay in IMF deal

2. Debt Management and Public Finances:

The country’s external debt restructuring is ongoing, with a precarious fiscal position requiring careful navigation. The NPP is compelled to maintain creditor confidence while addressing domestic demands for economic justice, including attempts to recover assets from foreign countries linked to corruption, which is likely to take years contrary to people’s expectations.

Factors to watch:

  • Debt restructuring deal with sovereign bond holders
  • Court ruling on a case filed by Hamilton Reserve Bank against default
  • Impact in debt restructuring due to delay in IMF disbursements
  • Impacts on local banking/financial sector due to debt restructuring

3. Social Inequality and Populist Promises:

Dissanayake campaigned on anti-corruption and systemic change, reflecting dissatisfaction with political elites. Delivering on these promises, especially in the context of past protests by his party-linked trade unions and public expectations, will be challenging without jeopardizing the country’s fragile economic stability. ​Most voters elected Dissanayake for his promise to address corruption. Analysts, however, say that change needs a holistic approach and not just arresting and punishing political leaders who are accused of corruption and impunity.

Factors to watch:

  • Ensuring justice in some key past court cases dragged for years, including Easter Sunday attack, Central Bank bond scam, and misuse of public funds
  • Impacts on new government’s popularity due to possible delays in some court cases
  • Protests by rival parties as NPP did when it was in the opposition
  • New measures to prevent corruption in future

4. Geopolitical Balancing Act:

The NPP’s ideological roots include a traditionally adversarial stance toward India and an inclination toward China and Russia. Dissanayake has sought to moderate these positions for pragmatic diplomacy, but skepticism remains around potential reversals on sensitive projects, such as those involving Indian and Chinese investments​. Before his election, his party promised to abolish a key Indian renewable power project in Northern Sri Lanka. However, Dissanayake’s party has backpaddled and said it will review India’s Adani project and renegotiate in January. So far Dissanayake has not strongly antagonized the New Delhi government. However, most party cadres of JVP led by Dissanayake have strong anti-India sentiments. They have been critical against Indian projects including Trincomalee Oil Tank farm project in the past. In addition to India and China, Dissanayake also has to manage better relations with the US, Russia, Japan, and EU nations. These relationships are crucial for Sri Lanka to come out of the current economic crisis and sovereign debt default.

Factors to watch:

  • Satisfying Indian demands including Adani, connectivity projects
  • Dealing with China and Russia
  • Dealing with the West including the US for investments, grants
  • Neutralizing some deals with foreign nations that are adverse to Sri Lanka

5. Inexperience and Legislative Control:

As the NPP has not previously governed, the lack of administrative experience poses a challenge. Furthermore, Dissanayake’s ability to enact reforms will be complicated if he fails to secure a stable parliamentary majority in the November 14 polls. Some of his appointments have already angered bureaucrats who say the new government has gone against the NPP’s promise of appointment based on meritocracy. It also does not have enough clean and corruption-free experts to negotiate international deals like IMF loan, debt restructuring, and energy deals. Such lack of expertise could make Dissanayake’s future government vulnerable to agree on less than what Sri Lanka should get in key international deals, analysts say.

Factors to watch:

  • Negotiations with IMF, commercial debtors, China, and India
  • Backing by Bureaucrats in future
  • Key appointments to Ministries and key state-owned enterprises
  • Reducing government expenditure without privatization

6. Public and Private Sector Expectations:

Dissanayake’s campaign included efforts to engage both grassroots and business interests, including support for domestic industry. However, maintaining this balancing act while satisfying private-sector concerns about market interventions will be demanding.

Factors to watch:

  • Tax reduction, new taxes on the public, private firms
  • Policies to boost small and medium enterprises (SMEs)
  • ​Policies on state sector recruitment
  • Investment policies

7. Political Reforms and Governance Structures: Dissanayake aims to abolish Sri Lanka’s controversial executive presidency, but constitutional amendments require broad support. Achieving consensus across a diverse and divided political landscape could be difficult​.

Factors to watch:

  • Strength of the parliament majority
  • Support he gets from other parties in the parliament
  • Possible conflict between NPP and hardcore JVP members
  • Relationship with former leaders who are still influential

(Colombo/November 13/2024)

https://economynext.com/explainer-sri-lankas-key-political-risks-after-parliamentary-elections-187149/

https://economynext.com/explainer-sri-lankas-key-political-risks-after-parliamentary-elections-187149/

The post Explainer: Sri Lanka’s key political risks after parliamentary elections appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
https://lankafocus.org/2024/11/14/explainer-sri-lankas-key-political-risks-after-parliamentary-elections/feed/ 0
Prepare a New Proposal to rationalize the Provincial Council System https://lankafocus.org/2024/10/22/prepare-a-new-proposal-to-rationalize-the-provincial-council-system/ https://lankafocus.org/2024/10/22/prepare-a-new-proposal-to-rationalize-the-provincial-council-system/#respond Tue, 22 Oct 2024 17:51:17 +0000 https://lankafocus.org/?p=2284 Published on: October 22, 2024 Prepare a New Proposal to rationalize the Provincial Council System Provincial Councils Should Act to Improve the Living Conditions of the People – Says the President at the Governors Meeting President Anura Kumara Dissanayake instructed the Governors to prepare and submit a new proposal aimed at rationalizing the Provincial Council mechanism. The President also stated that, given the current government’s transitional period, the provincial councils must strive to deliver the best possible services to improve the living conditions of the people. President Dissanayake made these…

The post Prepare a New Proposal to rationalize the Provincial Council System appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
Published on: October 22, 2024

Prepare a New Proposal to rationalize the Provincial Council System

Provincial Councils Should Act to Improve the Living Conditions of the People

– Says the President at the Governors Meeting

President Anura Kumara Dissanayake instructed the Governors to prepare and submit a new proposal aimed at rationalizing the Provincial Council mechanism.

The President also stated that, given the current government’s transitional period, the provincial councils must strive to deliver the best possible services to improve the living conditions of the people.

President Dissanayake made these remarks during a discussion held with the Governors this morning (22) at the Presidential Secretariat.

He urged the governors to engage in all possible economic and social initiatives to improve the living conditions of the public.

During the meeting, the President also highlighted the importance of establishing a new political culture and reiterated that the trust placed in him by the people should be fulfilled through effective action.

He reminded the Governors to avoid previous poor practices in the use of state assets and to remain committed to delivering quality public service.

Attention was drawn to existing vacancies in the health and education sectors under the Provincial Councils, with decisions made to find viable solutions.

The meeting included discussions on the lands in the Northern and Eastern provinces as well as finance.

Additionally, the President also made inquiries about the allocation of land to farmers in Kantale.

Participating Governors included Nagalingam Vedanayagam from the Northern Province, Champa Janaki Rajaratne from the Sabaragamuwa Province, Professor Jayantha Lal Ratnasekera from the Eastern Province, Kapila Jayasekera from the Uva Province, Bandula Harischandra from the Southern Province, Prof. Sarath Abeykoon from the Central Province, and Wasantha Kumara Wimalasiri from the North Central Province.

https://pmd.gov.lk/news/prepare-a-new-proposal-to-rationalize-the-provincial-council-system/

 

The post Prepare a New Proposal to rationalize the Provincial Council System appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
https://lankafocus.org/2024/10/22/prepare-a-new-proposal-to-rationalize-the-provincial-council-system/feed/ 0
How important was India’s help to Sri Lanka in 2022? https://lankafocus.org/2024/10/19/how-important-was-indias-help-to-sri-lanka-in-2022/ https://lankafocus.org/2024/10/19/how-important-was-indias-help-to-sri-lanka-in-2022/#respond Sat, 19 Oct 2024 05:06:51 +0000 https://lankafocus.org/?p=2277 How important was India’s help to Sri Lanka in 2022? The IMF program is to give Sri Lanka $ 3 billion over four years with conditions. India gave $ 4 billion in one year to Sri Lanka with no conditions. Also, the timing is important to note. The IMF program came in 2023 when Sri Lanka had stabilised to a large extent under President Ranil Wickremesinghe. Also, most of the toughest policies that were needed for Sri Lanka to achieve macroeconomic stability were already put in place by the former…

The post How important was India’s help to Sri Lanka in 2022? appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>

How important was India’s help to Sri Lanka in 2022?

The IMF program is to give Sri Lanka $ 3 billion over four years with conditions. India gave $ 4 billion in one year to Sri Lanka with no conditions. Also, the timing is important to note. The IMF program came in 2023 when Sri Lanka had stabilised to a large extent under President Ranil Wickremesinghe. Also, most of the toughest policies that were needed for Sri Lanka to achieve macroeconomic stability were already put in place by the former President Ranil Wickremesinghe when the IMF program was approved. But India came to Sri Lanka’s aid when Sri Lanka was staring at the abyss with a Government that was behaving very irrationally in January 2022 with the country facing macroeconomic instability. This point should not be forgotten by the Sri Lankan public

The Maldives is close to an economic crisis similar to which unfolded in Sri Lanka in 2022. The government of Muizzu came to power with an “India Out” campaign. But today, as was the case for Sri Lanka in 2022, when Maldives is in deep economic trouble and is close to defaulting, it is India that has come to its aid. India could have very well looked the other way but it didn’t. This should be a clear message for South Asian nations that they can have many best friends but India will remain the brother who will come to their help when things go bad.

The timing of India’s assistance in 2022

What most people in Sri Lanka do not realise is that India started rolling out its financial assistance totalling $ 4 billion (over the year) in January 2022 itself. Most of India’s $ 4 billion in 2022 came when President Gotabaya Rajapaksa was the President. In January 2022, the situation for Sri Lanka was dark. Sri Lanka needed to pay $ 6.9 billion by the end of 2022 and it only had $ 1.6 billion in reserves. Sri Lanka was shut out of international capital markets. It was staring at a default and the Government at that time was refusing to go to the IMF. Many other countries would have refrained from sending money to Sri Lanka in January 2022 as there was a strong possibility that that money would not be paid back any time soon. But still India went ahead and helped Sri Lanka.

IMF support vs. Indian support

The IMF program is to give Sri Lanka $ 3 billion over four years with conditions. India gave $ 4 billion in one year to Sri Lanka with no conditions. Also, the timing is important to note. The IMF program came in 2023 when Sri Lanka had stabilised to a large extent under President Ranil Wickremesinghe. Also, most of the toughest policies that were needed for Sri Lanka to achieve macroeconomic stability were already put in place by the former President Ranil Wickremesinghe when the IMF program was approved. But India came to Sri Lanka’s aid when Sri Lanka was staring at the abyss with a Government that was behaving very irrationally in January 2022 with the country facing macroeconomic instability. This point should not be forgotten by the Sri Lankan public. 

Support given by India in getting IMF assistance

An IMF program is essential for Sri Lanka as the IMF is not about the $3 billion it gives but the verification it brings. The IMF is like an auditor which brings trust to the nation back. World Bank and ADB funding is linked to the IMF and so are debt restructuring with many creditors. India was instrumental in making it easier for Sri Lanka to enter the IMF program. As a former minister was saying that the IMF Managing Director Kristalina Georgieva had told him, that when the Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman had met the IMF chief, the Indian Finance Minister had spent over 75% of her time speaking for Sri Lanka and only 25% of her time speaking about India. This shows the care and effort India placed in pushing the IMF to support Sri Lanka. India was also the first country to give financing assurance to the IMF for Sri Lanka and was one of the three key members of the Official creditor Committee along with France and Japan.

Indian Prime Minister’s help for Sri Lanka

A fact that is not mentioned much is the decision of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi in helping Sri Lanka. In January 2022, the Indian Prime Minister was two years away from reelection and in India there are many state elections in any given year in which his party, the BJP contests. Providing $ 4 billion to Sri Lanka is a large amount. PM Modi could have very well directed it towards domestic projects. For example, one of PM Modi’s flagship projects under his Production linked incentive scheme (PLI) was where the Indian government gave $ 2 billion worth of subsidies to Micron Technology to produce semiconductors in Gujarat which was to create 5,000 direct jobs and 15,000 indirect jobs. 

PM Modi could have easily been tempted to initiate two more projects like Micron in India which could have increased his votes rather than help Sri Lanka with $ 4 billion (which is twice the amount the Indian government directed towards Micron). Putting the well being of Sri Lankans even above domestic interests by the Indian government should not be forgotten by Sri Lankans. 

How significant is $ 4 billion for India?

Lastly, what many Sri Lankans need to realise is that $ 4 billion is much more significant for India than for the other bilateral creditors like Japan or even China. India is a lower middle income country and GDP per capita terms, Sri Lanka is still richer than India. In an imaginary situation, let’s say China (as it’s the largest bilateral creditor) and India both provided $ 4 billion in assistance for argument’s sake. China’s economy is almost five times larger than India’s so India’s assistance of $ 4 billion as a proportion of its economic size would be five times more valuable than $ 4 billion from China. 

Conclusion

India’s help was significant at a crucial time as Sri Lanka was going through a nightmarish situation in 2022. It is a good time for Sri Lankans to reflect on this crucial bilateral relationship with our neighbour to the north. The way forward does not have to be based on gratitude alone but more on opportunity. India is the fastest growing large economy in the world and soon set to be the third largest economy in the world. India’s middle class alone is set to hit 500 million which is an opportunity for Sri Lankan businesses. Sri Lanka is a country that is known to not miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. The next big opportunity for Sri Lanka is to our north and hope we do not miss this. 

(The writer is an Economist and he is an economic policy consultant at the Asian Development Bank. He is a regular columnist for the International Monetary Fund. The opinions expressed in this article are strictly the author’s 

personal views.)

https://www.ft.lk/opinion/How-important-was-India-s-help-to-Sri-Lanka-in-2022/14-768162

 

The post How important was India’s help to Sri Lanka in 2022? appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
https://lankafocus.org/2024/10/19/how-important-was-indias-help-to-sri-lanka-in-2022/feed/ 0
Back on table: $5 bil­lion road, rail link between India and Sri Lanka https://lankafocus.org/2024/10/16/back-on-table-5-billion-road-rail-link-between-india-and-sri-lanka/ https://lankafocus.org/2024/10/16/back-on-table-5-billion-road-rail-link-between-india-and-sri-lanka/#respond Wed, 16 Oct 2024 05:34:43 +0000 https://lankafocus.org/?p=2266 Back on table: $5 bil­lion road, rail link between India and Sri Lanka Discussions are in the final stages for a $5 billion road-and-rail link between India and Sri Lanka with India set to bear the cost of the stra­tegic project, said the island-nation’s environment secretary Prabath Chandrakeerthi. This is the first big bilat­eral infra­struc­ture project announced by the island nation since the recent election of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake amid efforts by New Delhi to counter Chinese influence. India is Sri Lanka’s largest trade partner and one of the…

The post Back on table: $5 bil­lion road, rail link between India and Sri Lanka appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>

Back on table: $5 bil­lion road, rail link between India and Sri Lanka

Discussions are in the final stages for a $5 billion road-and-rail link between India and Sri Lanka with India set to bear the cost of the stra­tegic project, said the island-nation’s environment secretary Prabath Chandrakeerthi.

This is the first big bilat­eral infra­struc­ture project announced by the island nation since the recent election of President Anura Kumara Dissanayake amid efforts by New Delhi to counter Chinese influence.

India is Sri Lanka’s largest trade partner and one of the largest foreign direct investment (FDI) contributors. Indian invest­ment in Sri Lanka amounted to about $142 mil­lion in 2021.

“Last month I participated in one meeting with India in New Delhi, and we are going to establish the highway and railway line connectivity between Rameswaram in India and Trincomalee in Sri Lanka,” B. K. Prabath Chandrakeerthi told Mint. “This is being planned as businessmen in both countries have to pay more and with the road and rail connectivity, both parties can get help because it will help in trade with European and other countries. Indian businessmen can also get some benefits from Sri Lanka as well,” Chandrakeerthi added.

“Last month I participated in one meet­ing with India in New Delhi, and we are going to estab­lish the high­way and railway line connectivity between Rameswaram in India and Trincomalee in Sri Lanka,” B. K. Prabath Chandrakeerthi told Mint. “This is being planned as busi­ness­men in both countries have to pay more and with the road and rail connectivity, both parties can get help because it will help in trade with European and other coun­tries. Indian busi­ness­men can also get some benefits from Sri Lanka as well,” Chandrakeerthi added.

The Sri Lankan government proposed a land bridge between Rameswaram in Tamil Nadu of India and Talaimannar, a village in Mannar Island of Sri Lanka in 2002 and signed an agreement on it.

As per the agree­ment, road and rail bridge links were to be developed, offer­ing eco­nomic benefits to both sides of the Palk Strait. However, after the agreement was signed, the Tamil Nadu government opposed the construction of the land bridge.

As per the agreement, road and rail bridge links were to be developed, offer­ing eco­nomic bene­fits to both sides of the Palk Strait. However, after the agreement was signed, the Tamil Nadu government opposed the construction of the land bridge.

The talks resumed in 2015 when Indian asked the Asian Devel­op­ment Bank to carry out pre-feasibility study for fin­an­cing a road and rail link between

India’s Rameswaram and Sri Lanka’s Talaimannar. But it has been decided to build the rail and road link up to Trincomalee, the offi­cial informed.

There is no land connection between Sri Lanka and India through road or railway. The closest Indian town to Sri Lanka, Dhanushkodi, had a rail­way sta­tion but this was washed out in a cyc­lone in 1964. A short boat ride till 1966 connected the rail­way sta­tions at Talaimannar in Sri Lanka and Dhanushkodi in India.

“The cost of the project is still not final­ized. We have to have more dis­cus­sion about that, but I think it is estim­ated to be nearly $5 billion,” the Lankan official said, and added: “It will entirely be borne by the Indian government. We have to get some approval for environmental clearance.”

He said the project may involve bridges and under­wa­ter tun­nels to allow unhindered movement of ships.

Queries sent to the spokespeople and secretaries of Indian road transport and highways, ports, shipping and waterways, railways, external affairs and environment ministries remained unanswered at press time.

Source: Mint
–Agencies

https://www.adaderana.lk/news.php?nid=102699

Add YourBack on table: $5 bil­lion road, rail link between India and Sri Lanka Heading Text Here

Back on table: $5 bil­lion road, rail link between India and Sri Lanka

The post Back on table: $5 bil­lion road, rail link between India and Sri Lanka appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
https://lankafocus.org/2024/10/16/back-on-table-5-billion-road-rail-link-between-india-and-sri-lanka/feed/ 0
ndo-Lanka joint energy projects dominate bilateral talks between Jaishankar and Wickremesinghe https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/ndo-lanka-joint-energy-projects-dominate-bilateral-talks-between-jaishankar-and-wickremesinghe/ https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/ndo-lanka-joint-energy-projects-dominate-bilateral-talks-between-jaishankar-and-wickremesinghe/#respond Fri, 21 Jun 2024 06:13:04 +0000 https://lankafocus.org/?p=2228 Indo-Lanka joint energy projects dominate bilateral talks between Jaishankar and Wickremesinghe Colombo, Jun 20 (PTI) External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and Sri Lankan President Ranil Wickremesinghe held bilateral discussions on Thursday, where joint energy projects, including a proposed petroleum pipeline linking the two countries, took centre stage. The two leaders focused on initiatives aimed at enhancing energy connectivity and developing the renewable energy sector. “Significant attention was given to plans for a Liquified Natural Gas supply, a proposed petroleum pipeline linking the two countries, and advancing oil and gas exploration…

The post ndo-Lanka joint energy projects dominate bilateral talks between Jaishankar and Wickremesinghe appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>

Indo-Lanka joint energy projects dominate bilateral talks between Jaishankar and Wickremesinghe

Colombo, Jun 20 (PTI) External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar and Sri Lankan President Ranil Wickremesinghe held bilateral discussions on Thursday, where joint energy projects, including a proposed petroleum pipeline linking the two countries, took centre stage.

The two leaders focused on initiatives aimed at enhancing energy connectivity and developing the renewable energy sector.

“Significant attention was given to plans for a Liquified Natural Gas supply, a proposed petroleum pipeline linking the two countries, and advancing oil and gas exploration projects,” an official press release said.

It was announced that construction of the solar power plant in the eastern district of Trincomalee is set to commence next month.

The discussions also covered projects supported by the Indian government to enhance Sri Lanka’s liquid milk industry and fertiliser production.

Jaishankar and Wickremesinghe also discussed India’s support for developing Trincomalee and expanding the Kankesanthurai port in the north.

The ongoing development of Jaffna Airport and Colombo Airport with Indian assistance was also a key topic, alongside the acceleration of Sri Lanka’s unique digital identity card project, marking a significant step towards the country’s digitisation efforts.

A highlight of the engagement was the formal commissioning of the Maritime Rescue Coordination Centre (MRCC), comprising a main centre in Colombo and a sub-centre in Hambantota, the location of the Chinese-funded port.

Jaishankar arrived here early in the morning. It is his first visit in his second consecutive term in office.

The visit comes at a time when Sri Lanka’s Supreme Court on Tuesday gave Prime Minister Dinesh Gunawardena, the Cabinet and the Adani Group three weeks to file preliminary objections to a petition filed by an environmental group against the wind power project undertaken by the Indian conglomerate at Mannar in the northeast region.

Meanwhile, some opposition members in Parliament raised concerns about the short length of Jaishankar’s visit, claiming it was a means to pressurise Sri Lanka over projects.

The Sri Lankan government has been maintaining that the Adani group investment was vital to achieving its target of 70 per cent of its power needs to renewable energy sources by 2030. In May, the government approved a 20-year power purchase agreement with Adani Green Energy to develop 484-megawatt wind power stations in the northeast region.

The post ndo-Lanka joint energy projects dominate bilateral talks between Jaishankar and Wickremesinghe appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/ndo-lanka-joint-energy-projects-dominate-bilateral-talks-between-jaishankar-and-wickremesinghe/feed/ 0
Sri Lanka: Accountability needed for enforced disappearances https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/elementor-2216/ https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/elementor-2216/#respond Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:28:58 +0000 https://lankafocus.org/?p=2216 Sri Lanka: Accountability needed for enforced disappearances Sri Lanka must ensure accountability for decades of enforced disappearances – UN report GENEVA (17 May 2024) – Sri Lanka’s Government must take meaningful action to determine and disclose the fates and whereabouts of tens of thousands of people who have been subjected to enforced disappearance over the decades and hold those responsible to account, a UN Human Rights Office report released today says. It calls on the Government to acknowledge the involvement of State security forces and affiliated paramilitary groups, and to issue…

The post Sri Lanka: Accountability needed for enforced disappearances appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>

Sri Lanka: Accountability needed for enforced disappearances

Sri Lanka must ensure accountability for decades of enforced disappearances – UN report

GENEVA (17 May 2024) – Sri Lanka’s Government must take meaningful action to determine and disclose the fates and whereabouts of tens of thousands of people who have been subjected to enforced disappearance over the decades and hold those responsible to account, a UN Human Rights Office report released today says.

It calls on the Government to acknowledge the involvement of State security forces and affiliated paramilitary groups, and to issue a public apology.

“This report is yet another reminder that all Sri Lankans who have been subjected to enforced disappearance must never be forgotten,” said UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk. “Their families and those who care about them have been waiting for so long. They are entitled to know the truth.”

“The Government owes it to all those who have been forcibly disappeared. It is critical for these crimes to be investigated fully. These crimes haunt not only their loved ones, but entire communities and Sri Lankan society as a whole.”

Despite some positive formal steps by successive governments, such as the ratification of the International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, the establishment of the Office on Missing Persons and the Office for Reparations, tangible progress on the ground towards comprehensively resolving individual cases has remained limited, the report finds.

Between the 1970s and 2009, widespread enforced disappearances were carried out primarily by Sri Lankan security forces and affiliated paramilitary groups. The Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam also engaged in abductions which the UN Working Group on Enforced or Involuntary Disappearances described as “tantamount to enforced disappearances”.

Based on individual and group interviews, the report details the enduring psychological, social, and economic impact of enforced disappearances on the families of those forcibly disappeared, especially women. As most disappeared individuals have been male, women have often become the sole income-earner for a family, in a labour environment that poses many obstacles to women’s participation, including risks of sexual harassment and exploitation.

It adds that many women who have been at the forefront of efforts to find the disappeared have themselves been subjected to violations, including harassment, intimidation, surveillance, arbitrary detention, beatings and torture at the hands of army and police. “They told me if I continue, they will cut my husband in pieces or that they will go after my children,” said a woman who is still seeking a loved one.

Under international law, it is a clear obligation for the State to resolve cases of enforced disappearances, which constitute continuing violations, until the fate and whereabouts of those disappeared are clarified, said the High Commissioner.

Yet, most victim families remain without such clarification. “Two weeks passed, then two months, then two years. Now it has been 32 years, and I am still waiting,” said a man who testified before a national commission of inquiry about his disappeared son.

Successive commissions of inquiry have been created by the Government. However, only a few of their reports have been made public and even when published, access has usually been limited. Most recommendations, particularly those relating to criminal accountability, have not been implemented. Alleged perpetrators, including current and former senior officials and diplomats, continue to evade justice.

Despite the passage of nearly 15 years since the end of the armed conflict, and many decades since the earliest waves of enforced disappearances, Sri Lankan authorities are still failing to ensure accountability for these violations. “Accountability must be addressed. We need to see institutional reform for reconciliation to have a chance to succeed,” said Türk.

https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2024/05/sri-lanka-accountability-needed-enforced-disappearances

The post Sri Lanka: Accountability needed for enforced disappearances appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/elementor-2216/feed/ 0
Petitioners seek SC intervention against Mannar Wind Power Project https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/petitioners-seek-sc-intervention-against-mannar-wind-power-project/ https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/petitioners-seek-sc-intervention-against-mannar-wind-power-project/#respond Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:02:55 +0000 https://lankafocus.org/?p=2207 Petitioners seek SC intervention against Mannar Wind Power Project citing public interest The Bishop of the Diocese of Mannar and three prominent environmentalists this week petitioned the Supreme Court in the public interest against the proposed 250 MW Mannar Wind Power Project by Adani Green Energy. Rev. Dr. Fidelis Lionel Emmanuel Fernando along with Rohan Pethiyagoda, Prof. Nimal Gunatilleke and Prof. Sarath Kotagama have challenged the procurement process and proposed construction of the project by Adani Green Energy PTE Ltd and/or Adani Green Energy S L Limited. The case names…

The post Petitioners seek SC intervention against Mannar Wind Power Project appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>

Petitioners seek SC intervention against Mannar Wind Power Project citing public interest

The Bishop of the Diocese of Mannar and three prominent environmentalists this week petitioned the Supreme Court in the public interest against the proposed 250 MW Mannar Wind Power Project by Adani Green Energy.

Rev. Dr. Fidelis Lionel Emmanuel Fernando along with Rohan Pethiyagoda, Prof. Nimal Gunatilleke and Prof. Sarath Kotagama have challenged the procurement process and proposed construction of the project by Adani Green Energy PTE Ltd and/or Adani Green Energy S L Limited.

The case names 67 respondents including the Cabinet of Ministers, the Sri Lanka Sustainable Energy Authority (SLSEA), the Central Environmental Authority (CEA), the Board of Investment, the Ceylon Electricity Board, the Public Utilities Commission Sri Lanka and the Attorney General, among others.

It raises concerns regarding the credibility of the project’s environmental impact assessment (EIA) and the role played by the SLSEA. It flags certain procedural issues in the awarding of the purported contract and questions the characterisation of the project as a government-to-government deal.

It questions the basis for the negotiated tariff to be fixed at USD 8.26 cents per kilowatt-hour for a period of 20 years when the EIA conducts its assessment based on a cost of USD 4.6 cents, potentially causing considerable financial loss to the country and a burden on consumers.

The petition also states that, notwithstanding the intensely public nature of the project, its vital importance to the general public and public resources, including the natural environment, as well as the paramountcy of transparency and openness in good governance, “there is a paucity of available data and information”.

It requests Court to compel the release of the entire files and records including the call for bids for (if any) and responses to both the Mannar and proposed 234MW Pooneryn plants; records of deliberations and negotiations; Cabinet memoranda and decisions; unit price discussions including formulae related to the computation of the price per kilowatt hour; the criteria and benchmarks or any other basis for assessments of the project; and other relevant information.

The petition holds that the EIA commissioned by the SLSEA “appears to be a formality, conducted with a premeditated intention/decision to award the construction and operation of the project to predetermined contractors”.

Despite the CEA being the designated body, it appears from publicly disseminated information that the Power and Energy Minister was de facto acting in the capacity of the project approving authority, it states.

There is no transparency surrounding the purported leasing of 202 hectares acquired on Mannar Island for the project; and no information on compensation payable to affected landowners, the cost of which should be recovered from the investor.

The EIA has also not adequately evaluated alternative sites—Ambewela, the South East coast, Kalpitiya and Jaffna—or expressed “any acceptable rationale” for why Mannar Island was chosen.

“The promotion of Mannar when compared to other sites is made even more confounding given that it is the focal point of the Central Asian Flyway for over five million [5,000,000] migratory birds travelling to, and through, Mannar island on an annual basis, making it a crucial area for conservation and tourism which aspects are not as markedly evident in the other sites considered,” the petition states.

In seeking their relief, the petitioners pray that the Supreme Court declares a violation of their fundamental rights and that of the citizenry at large and the decisions made to award the project to Adani as wrongful; and calls for any consequential actions undertaken to be declared illegal.

The petition states that the case has been filed to further the national interest, to preserve and protect public property, including the environment, flora and fauna, public finances and to safeguard the rights and freedoms of the general public of Sri Lanka and its future generations.

https://www.sundaytimes.lk/240616/news/petitioners-seek-sc-intervention-against-mannar-wind-power-project-citing-public-interest-560422.html

The post Petitioners seek SC intervention against Mannar Wind Power Project appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/petitioners-seek-sc-intervention-against-mannar-wind-power-project/feed/ 0
Australian company’s multibillion sandmining project in Mannar https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/australian-companys-multibillion-sandmining-project-in-mannar/ https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/australian-companys-multibillion-sandmining-project-in-mannar/#respond Fri, 21 Jun 2024 04:45:12 +0000 https://lankafocus.org/?p=2199 Australian company’s multibillion sandmining project mired in Mannar protests Protests hinder progress towards mining licence Residents allege large-scale land robberies involving brokers working for company  Environmentalists fear existential threats such as soil losing fertility and contamination of water sources  Company representative downplays impacts of the project on people’s livelihood  By Mimi Alphonsus and S. Rubatheesan For over a decade, an Australian company has tried to secure mining licences to extract heavy mineral sands from the ecologically rich region of Mannar Island—the fourth largest ilmenite deposit in the world—with little success.…

The post Australian company’s multibillion sandmining project in Mannar appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>

Australian company’s multibillion sandmining project mired in Mannar protests

  • Protests hinder progress towards mining licence
  • Residents allege large-scale land robberies involving brokers working for company 
  • Environmentalists fear existential threats such as soil losing fertility and contamination of water sources 
  • Company representative downplays impacts of the project on people’s livelihood 

By Mimi Alphonsus and S. Rubatheesan

For over a decade, an Australian company has tried to secure mining licences to extract heavy mineral sands from the ecologically rich region of Mannar Island—the fourth largest ilmenite deposit in the world—with little success.

Renewed attempts to push the project further were met with protests by locals over land usage and severe existential concerns about the environmental consequences.

Renewed attempts to push the project further were met with protests by locals. Pic by Joseph Nayan

The Australian company, Titanium Sands Limited (TSL), along with their local subsidiaries, have engaged in exploration activities covering vast swathes of Mannar Island. Its preliminary scientific studies found key minerals such as ilmenite, rutile, zircon and garnet. According to data from the Geological Survey and Mines Bureau (GSMB), Mannar Island has 53 million metric tonnes of mineral soil.

The company has secured land access agreements for mining on 296 acres, according to the company’s responses to the “Basic Information Questionnaire” (BIQ) submitted to the Central Environmental Authority (CEA). The Sunday Times obtained a copy through a Right to Information (RTI) request.

TSL is currently in discussions with GSMB to secure a mining licence with a pending environmental impact assessment (EIA), which is yet to be finalised due to protests by local communities.

Environmental concerns 

The CEA’s Environmental Assessment and Management Division Deputy Director General, N.S. Gamage, told the Sunday Times that they were unable to conduct the required preliminary scoping study before beginning the EIA since residents vehemently opposed the project.

“The project proponent then approached the Presidential Secretariat, which requested a meeting to share information with the public at the Mannar District Secretariat,” said Mr. Gamage.

On May 13, a multi-stakeholder meeting was held at the Mannar District Secretariat to “brief” the local communities, fishermen unions, and civil society groups. There were heated exchanges between company representatives and local communities, who argued that if mining at a depth of 2 to 10 metres is allowed on low-lying land like Mannar Island, it would lead to saltwater contamination and flooding and ruin the fertile soil.

One concerned local among the audience was heard saying, “Don’t try to hoodwink our people with your lies. This is our land. We won’t accept any report you bring forward. If you pay enough, they will write any number of lies in it.”

Mannar District Secretary K. Kanakeshwaran also acknowledged receiving multiple complaints and petitions from local communities opposing the multibillion-dollar project.

During the meeting, the mining company representatives downplayed the short- and long-term impacts of the project.

Sivanesan Somanathar, an environmental consultant commissioned by TSL, said that an EIA would be necessary to assess all environmental risks and that many concerns could be mitigated.

In his presentation, he said there would be “no dewatering” and “no saltwater intrusion” and assured replanting of whichever vegetation the landowner preferred after the project’s completion.

The project BIQ submitted by the company to CEA indicated short-term impacts on soils and land use, surface and groundwater quality, and drainage and hydrology, as well as medium-term impacts on the landscape and visual environment.

GSMB’s Senior Director of Geology Starin Fernando dismissed claims that exploration drilling below the water table is harmful. “However, at the mining stage, if it goes below the water table, there will be saltwater intrusion,” he said. However, he said GSMB does not deal with this problem, and the National Water Supply and Drainage Board should provide tentative solutions.

Environmentalists and conservators raised serious concerns about the long-term impact of the project on a rich biodiverse region like Mannar Island, which is home to 874 hectares of mangrove plants and located in the global migratory path of some 400 bird species.

The 31,135-acre Mannar Island where the proposed project will be implemented is a highly populated area with 70,379 people residing there.

For Dr. Soosai Anandan, a retired Professor of Geography at the University of Jaffna, this project sounds the death knell for local habitats and communities who are still struggling to revive the rural economy after the end of the civil war in 2009.

“This project, if implemented, will not only change the landscape and terrain of the island as a whole but further accelerate the existing livelihood issues such as access to safe drinking water, farming and fishing,” Prof. Anandan said.

“The island is already below sea level. When they drill and mine in this sensitive region, the seawater will seep through the land, posing a threat to farming and drinking water,” he said.

Land Issues 

Another point of contention has been land access for the project. “My family had 35 acres of palmyrah land for generations,” said a resident of Olaithoduvai who sells palmyrah toddy, fronds and firewood for a living.

“It is our ancestral wealth, but we don’t have title deeds for it. When they brought in these private land ownership laws decades ago, our people did not know how to get this land registered,” he explained. “Suddenly, big landlords from other villages started to fence it up in recent years, and, shortly after, big machinery appeared. I can’t access the palmyrah forest on that land and earn my income.”

Other residents are fearful that their livestock will lose access to grazing lands due to landscape changes. According to the BIQ, 60% of the lands proposed for mining are forested areas, and the project will require the removal of topsoil and vegetation.

The Sunday Times inspected government survey maps and spoke to the Land Title Settlement Department to understand the land problem. In several areas where TSL claims that land access agreements have been procured, ownership is tagged as “claimant not known.”

Mannar has hundreds of acres of land with unclear ownership or disputed cases, partly due to delays in drawing up a “village plan” by the Land Title Settlement Department but also owing to decades of wartime displacement. As a result, communities that have lived and worked there for generations are vulnerable to land grabbing.

Local officials who requested anonymity told the Sunday Times that TSL and other companies have been procuring land on Mannar Island by signing agreements with individuals who have made a “declaration deed,” a legal document claiming ownership.

“The government will only register a property if they are 100% sure of its ownership, but a company need not adhere to the same standard and can make agreements with whoever claims the land and is willing to give it to them,” explained the official. “Once they make a declaration deed, they transfer it a few times so it has a history and becomes normalised.”

Although not illegal, the official believes the process is being abused.

Villagers whose lands were utilised for exploration activities allege that middlemen, who collected land details and approached them individually with false promises to secure land access, later handed these properties over to the mining company.

“This way, they can pay a small sum to the aggrieved family and get them not to claim the land.” Another resident said she and her family agreed to hand over their lands to a big landowner as they had no deeds to challenge his claim. “They promised to pay us money in return, but I haven’t received a cent,” she alleged.

Saliya Galagoda, TSL’s local representative, acknowledged that large landowners were fencing off properties in sand mining areas, but he said they were doing so of their own volition and solely to increase the price when mining companies try to access the land.

Mistrust in the project also stems from years of secretive practices adopted by various companies to secure access to the land. Residents said that for years, local companies and brokers approached them for exploration by saying they were “checking the water,” “researching sand,” and part of a “government project.”

Speaking on condition of anonymity, a former broker who worked for one such company said that they would use “politically big people” to ensure villagers didn’t question the project too much. “Because people knew who I was in the community, they let me enter and explore their lands,” he said. “I don’t feel good about it.”

TSL’s Galagoda, who took over the project in 2021, said that since he started working, things have been done “correctly.” “We paid Rs. 12,500 for every single hole that was drilled,” he added.

While the application for a mining licence at the moment covers a relatively modest area, TSL currently has over 17,000 acres—more than half of Mannar Island—under retention. According to the GSMB licensing process, TSL has one to two years to apply for and receive a mining licence before retention expires permanently.

 

TSL complains of delays in obtaining approval

Despite nearly two years passing since Titanium Sands Ltd. (TSL) completed exploration activities, the company is awaiting approvals to begin the environmental studies. It says this is “something that has continually been delayed by the political situation in Sri Lanka.”

In a written response to the questionnaire sent by the Sunday Times, TSL Director Jason Ferris claimed the company has so far invested Rs. 2 billion from foreign sources on the project, and another Rs. 24 billion will be invested once the mining licence is approved.

“Exploration was only completed in 2022, and the final resource report was presented to GSMB in September 2022, which was accepted and signed off by GSMB. Since this time, the company has been waiting on the government process for each of the next stages; so the official mining licence process has been ongoing for approx. 18 months, not 10 years,” Mr. Ferris said.

Responding to the cancellations of exploration licences for TSL-owned companies in 2021 and their subsequent renewal, the company said “under legal opinion, the structure of TSL was proven correct and new licences were issued.”

TSL denied receiving any benefits through tax holidays but indicated that “BOI discussions are ongoing along with the EIA discussions, which are constantly delayed by government departments not doing their jobs.”

https://www.sundaytimes.lk/240616/news/australian-companys-multibillion-sandmining-project-mired-in-mannar-protests-560380.html

The post Australian company’s multibillion sandmining project in Mannar appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
https://lankafocus.org/2024/06/21/australian-companys-multibillion-sandmining-project-in-mannar/feed/ 0
Hypocrites as democrats https://lankafocus.org/2024/05/30/hypocrites-as-democrats/ https://lankafocus.org/2024/05/30/hypocrites-as-democrats/#respond Thu, 30 May 2024 04:24:46 +0000 https://lankafocus.org/?p=2189 Hypocrites as democrats   Thursday 30th May, 2024 Opposition politicians and some of their government counterparts have taken up the cudgels for the people’s franchise following UNP General Secretary Palitha Range Bandara’s call for postponing the next presidential and parliamentary polls by two years. They say they are ready to do all it takes to prevent the postponement of elections. Bandara’s proposal could be considered a trial balloon floated at the behest of the UNP leadership. However, it is doubtful whether the UNP will dare make an attempt to postpone…

The post Hypocrites as democrats appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>

Hypocrites as democrats

 

Thursday 30th May, 2024

Opposition politicians and some of their government counterparts have taken up the cudgels for the people’s franchise following UNP General Secretary Palitha Range Bandara’s call for postponing the next presidential and parliamentary polls by two years. They say they are ready to do all it takes to prevent the postponement of elections.

Bandara’s proposal could be considered a trial balloon floated at the behest of the UNP leadership. However, it is doubtful whether the UNP will dare make an attempt to postpone the upcoming presidential election. There is no constitutional provision for such a course of action. President Ranil Wickremesinghe has reportedly said the presidential election will be held, but why the UNP’s proposal at issue has caused so much concern to the public is understandable.

The UNP has an ugly history of trifling with the people’s franchise; it caused a general election to disappear, so to speak, in 1982, with the help of a heavily-rigged referendum. Old habits are said to die hard. The UNP must be made to regret having entertained the idea of postponing national elections again.

The question however is whether some of the self-proclaimed champions of democracy could be trusted with the task of protecting the people’s franchise, given their sordid past. They are trying to win some brownie points with the public by condemning the UNP, which they once honeymooned with and assisted in suppressing democracy.

Prominent among those who are hauling the UNP over the coals are the JVP/NPP and the SLPP. JVP/NPP Leader Anura Kumara Dissanayake, MP, has declared that his party will never allow the UNP to postpone elections. Amusingly, the SLPP, too, has jumped on the bandwagon; its National Organiser, Namal Rajapaksa, has said his party is ready to go to any extent to defeat the UNP’s move to postpone elections. He has claimed that under the Rajapaksa governments, elections were never delayed. These politicians seem to think Sri Lankans have drunk from the Lethe (‘River of Forgetfulness’) or are a bunch of fools.

Both Namal and Anura apparently have a very low opinion of public intelligence. The SLPP has postponed the Local Government (LG) elections twice. First, it put off the mini polls on President Gotabaya Rajapaksa’s watch in early 2022, unable to face the public; the second postponement of the LG polls came under President Wickremesinghe, who audaciously claimed there were no funds for elections. The SLPP endorsed his position. What moral right does the SLPP have to condemn the UNP for stifling democracy while helping President Wickremesinghe make draconian laws? The Rajapaksas are running with the public and hunting with the UNP, in a manner of speaking.

The JVP, which has taken the moral high ground, unflinchingly helped the UNP-led Yahapalana government postpone the Provincial Council (PC) elections. It voted for amending the PC Elections Act for that purpose in 2017. What Parliament passed became a textbook example of the proverbial Christmas tree bill, given the sheer number of riders; the final draft contained more additional sections than the original text due to extensive committee-stage revisions effected by the Yahapalana government to bypass judicial review. The TNA, the UNP, the UPFA including its dissidents, the SLMC, etc., voted for that obnoxious Bill. The SJB politicians and their SLPP counterparts were in the UNP and the UPFA, respectively, at the time.

The SLFP postponed a general election in 1975 by two years, creating an extremely bad precedent, which the UNP followed eight years later. The JVP committed heinous crimes in a bid to sabotage elections in the late 1980s. Its sparrow units murdered people and/or cut off their hands for voting. Those brave men and women who sacrificed their lives to save democracy have been forgotten, but the criminals who were responsible for heinous crimes against them are commemorated every year! The JVP’s spree of violence aimed at scuttling elections in the late 1980s stood the UNP in good stead as it created conditions for widespread rigging, which helped extend the UNP’s undemocratic rule.

There is no gainsaying that the UNP deserves all the bashing it receives, and must be prevented from suppressing democracy, but its critics are no paragons of virtue, as can be seen from their ruthless attacks on democracy or contribution thereto in the past or even at present. No wonder anti-politics is on the rise with public resentment welling up. The least that the self-styled defenders of democracy could do to assuage public anger is to apologise for their sins and seek forgiveness.

Hypocrites as democrats

The post Hypocrites as democrats appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
https://lankafocus.org/2024/05/30/hypocrites-as-democrats/feed/ 0
Gist of the translation of the declarations made in the 2024 Congress of SocialDemocratic Party of Tamils – SDPT- Pathmanabha EPRLF https://lankafocus.org/2024/05/22/gist-of-the-translation-of-the-declarations-made-in-the-2024-congress-of-socialdemocratic-party-of-tamils-sdpt-pathmanabha-eprlf/ https://lankafocus.org/2024/05/22/gist-of-the-translation-of-the-declarations-made-in-the-2024-congress-of-socialdemocratic-party-of-tamils-sdpt-pathmanabha-eprlf/#respond Wed, 22 May 2024 15:39:44 +0000 https://lankafocus.org/?p=2168 The post Gist of the translation of the declarations made in the 2024 Congress of SocialDemocratic Party of Tamils – SDPT- Pathmanabha EPRLF appeared first on Lanka Focus.

]]>
  • Full and proper implementation of the 13th Amendment of the constitution. Appropriate devolution arrangements for the Muslims and upcountry Tamils.
  • The postponement of Provincial Council and Local government elections by the government is anti-democratic and denial of fundamental rights of the people. We demand immediate elections for these institutions. We call upon the government to make appropriate constitutional change that ensures to prevent recurrence of this in the future.
  • Provincial council system, meaningful devolution to provinces, and holding elections regularly according to the constitution are essential to ensure
    democratic structures in Sri Lanka. It also accelerates the economic development at the periphery. SDPT will endeavour to work with all democratic
    parties, social and political activists in Sri Lanka to campaign for regular elections for all provinces.
  • SDPT will forge relationships and engage in united actions with all progressive and democratic parties in Srilanka working amongst the Tamil, Sinhala, Muslim, and Upcountry communities with the following objectives. Strengthening the Provincial governance, calling for the social and democratic rights for all communities, and to oppose any efforts that undermines the rights of the minority communities by the government and Sinhala and Tamil chauvinist parties.
  • Prevention of Terrorism act which is in place for the last 46 years and should be abolished forthwith. We will also oppose similar acts in the future. Calling for the immediate release of all the political prisoners.
  • The plantation workers who contributed immensely to the economy for the last two centuries still has no right to lands, economic security or even a postal address. Government should grant lands to these people without delay, so that they can build their lives independently.
  • There should be constitutional guarantees to ensure that Sri Lanka is a multi-ethnic, multi -cultural and a multi-religious nation. It should not be a threat to any communities.
  • The government’s priorities should be to guarantee that the basic need of every citizen is available at affordable prices. Education and health services should remain public service. Privatisation of these essential services will lead to the denial of the fundamental rights of vast majority of the people. There should be adequate welfare provision for the unemployed and the vulnerable sections of the society,
  • The government should make it a priority to provide satisfactory social security to all working people in the agriculture, industrial and fisheries sectors.
  • Government institutions and religious entities are engaged in a drive to acquire vast amounts of lands sometimes using security forces which is threatening the very existence and deprive the local people of economic opportunities. This land grab program particularly in the Northern and Eastern provinces should stop forthwith.
  • Disproportionate presence and appropriation of vast lands by the security forces is a major cause for concern in the Northern and Eastern Provinces. This causes unwarranted suspicions, frustration, and unease amongst the local people. This is also impacting the community relations and a drain in the economy. We urge the government to take necessary measures to reduce the number of personals.
  • The issue of disappeared persons during the long war continue to cause immense distress to the families of the victims. A closure on this issue is
    essential for the reconciliation process. We call for appropriate legislative and institutional mechanisms to prevent such violations in the future.
  • Drug abuse is increasing in the recent past and destroying our social fabric. Measures need to be taken to increase the awareness in the community and special law and order measures needs to be taken to contain the situation.
  • Cast discrimination in our society, particularly in the Northern Province is a curse and not less than the apartheid practice in causing misery and denial of rights and dignity. Awareness is needed amongst all communities and work towards building a social movement to combat this vestige of feudal societies of yesteryears. There is also a need for stringent legislations in place to punish those who promote such discrimination.
  • Women in our society are subjected to various forms of persecution and discrimination. We need a powerful social movement to combat this. There is a need for strengthening the laws relating to equal opportunities and guarantee equal representation in elected assemblies and in state and private sectors.
  • The increasing number of road accidents and number of deaths are a serious cause for concern. Measures needs to be taken to improve the standards of regulatory arrangements. There is also a need for coordinated actions by the relevant departments, and community organisations.
  • Sri Lankan people were divided by the racist political forces from all communities. Thirty-year civil war further damaged the ethnic harmony. Since
    the end of the war, there has not been any serious effort made to strengthen understanding amongst the communities or establish equality for all
    communities. In recent times, there is also an effort by some sections from all communities to instigate religious conflicts. To combat this continuing trend all progressive forces and those who are committed to social equality should work together unitedly.
  • We acknowledge the aspirations of the people in the “Aragalaya” uprising. It was a movement primarily focussed against the corruption, nepotism in the ruling elite and the economic hardships faced by the people because of these. Despite its limited success the same corrupt ruling political classes retained the reins of the government. If corruption and misuse of powers of the rulers continue, it will be inevitable that there will be uprising again.
  • In relation to the issue of bottom trawling and other methods of unlawful fishing practices that destroy the fishing stock in that region, should stop forthwith. The disputes between the fishing communities should be addressed through negotiations between all the stake holders. We urge the Tamil Nadu Government to take necessary steps to amicable settlements between fishing communities from both sides of the border. The issues about violating international waters, and the issue of Katchathievu should not be linked to the fishermen’s day to day life issues that will only further complicate the matters.
  • In the present world order, rich gets richer and vast majority of the population suffer, hunger, poverty, unemployment, trapped in debt, and live in appalling conditions. This world order should be changed, and we aspire to establish a new world order that serves the interests of the suffering majority.
  • It is a fact that the Palestinians are subjected to aggression and genocide by the Zionist regime. Several thousand Palestinians were killed since 1948. This conflict is affecting the whole of West Asian countries. We believe that the immediate halt of military aggression in Gaza and West bank and the recognition of two state solutions to bring permanent peace to the region.
  • The earth is fast becoming uninhabitable because of the unresponsible exploitation of the environment by humans. Urgent measures need to be put in
    place to protect the environment and there is a need to intensify awareness programs and collective direct actions,
  • Our party would endeavour to build strong working relationship and work in solidarity with all the people and organisations in the world which strive to
    achieve peace, social equality, freedom, liberty, and fraternity, of mankind. We will seek to learn lessons from countries and governments and political parties which have committed to social democratic values and programs.
  • The post Gist of the translation of the declarations made in the 2024 Congress of SocialDemocratic Party of Tamils – SDPT- Pathmanabha EPRLF appeared first on Lanka Focus.

    ]]>
    https://lankafocus.org/2024/05/22/gist-of-the-translation-of-the-declarations-made-in-the-2024-congress-of-socialdemocratic-party-of-tamils-sdpt-pathmanabha-eprlf/feed/ 0